- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno10 Pro (China) vs nubia Z50 Ultra
OPPO Reno10 Pro (China) vs ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra
What Reno10 Pro (China) does better (7) and where nubia Z50 Ultra wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display8.7
8.3Camera9.6
6.7Battery7.4
7.9Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 Pro (China)nubia Z50 Ultra
| Reno10 Pro (China) | nubia Z50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 163.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 228 g | −42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 Pro (China) better than nubia Z50 Ultra?
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Weight186 g vs 228 g+23%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 400 ppi+13%
- Charged in 30 min167% vs 100%+67%
- Resolution (width)1,240 px vs 1,116 px+11%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.3 mm+8%
Why is nubia Z50 Ultra better than Reno10 Pro (China)?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno10 Pro (China): Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Optical zoom2× vs 3.3×+65%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,500 nits+7%
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 228 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, Silver, Starry Sky |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,116 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.6% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,842,269 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,336 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,702 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 3.3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 167% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | MyOS 13 |
