- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno10 (China) vs Redmi Note 12T Pro
OPPO Reno10 (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
What Reno10 (China) does better (12) and where Redmi Note 12T Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.0
7.6Camera7.2
6.3Battery8.0
7.9Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 (China)Redmi Note 12T Pro
| Reno10 (China) | Redmi Note 12T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 200 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 (China) better than Redmi Note 12T Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 650 nits+46%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight180 g vs 200 g+11%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 75%+81%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.9 mm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 85.1%+5%
Why is Redmi Note 12T Pro better than Reno10 (China)?
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno10 (China): Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,080 mAh+10%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno10 (China): Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 407 ppi+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Blue | Blue, White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,207,095 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,222 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,703 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, ultrasound proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | MIUI 14 |
