- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno10 5G vs Camon 20 Pro 5G
OPPO Reno10 5G vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
What Reno10 5G does better (8) and where Camon 20 Pro 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.5
5.6Performance6.4
5.8Camera8.1
7.2Battery6.0
8.7Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 5GCamon 20 Pro 5G
| Reno10 5G | Camon 20 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.7 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.9 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 193 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 5G better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Wired charging67 W vs 33 W2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Charged in 30 min74% vs 38%+95%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 900 nits+6%
- Weight185 g vs 193 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio93% vs 87%+7%
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than Reno10 5G?
- AnTuTu score802,497 vs 1,031,881+29%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno10 5G: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,375 vs 2,905+22%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Reno10 5G: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · Reno10 5G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno10 5G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz+15%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.7 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Dragontrail Glass | — |
| Colours | Gray, Blue | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | 807 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93% | 87% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 802,497 | 1,031,881 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,375 | 2,905 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,300 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 74% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13.1 | HIOS 14 |
