- android.gs
- Compare
- K9 vs Galaxy A52s 5G
OPPO K9 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
What K9 does better (6) and where Galaxy A52s 5G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display7.4
7.5Camera8.7
4.8Battery3.2
5.0Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
K9Galaxy A52s 5G
| K9 | Galaxy A52s 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.1 mm | 159.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 75.1 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 189 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K9 better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Wired charging65 W vs 25 W2.6×
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+17%
- Weight172 g vs 189 g+10%
- Charged in 30 min86% vs 53%+62%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.4 mm+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than K9?
- Optical stabilisationNo · K9: Yes
- NFCNo · K9: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · K9: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+5%
- Memory card slotNo · K9: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · K9: Yes
- Peak brightness750 nits vs 800 nits+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 159.1 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Aurora | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 750 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250-AC Snapdragon 768G 5G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 429,675 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,060 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 685 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.88 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | One UI 6 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A05svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.87.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A327.75.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A04svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23vsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G8.57.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G7.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 127.76.4

