- android.gs
- Compare
- K9 Pro vs GT Explorer Master
OPPO K9 Pro vs Realme GT Explorer Master
What K9 Pro does better (5) and where GT Explorer Master wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display7.6
7.2Camera8.9
5.2Battery5.2
8.7Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
K9 ProGT Explorer Master
| K9 Pro | GT Explorer Master | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.7 mm | 159.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 72.5 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 185 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K9 Pro better than GT Explorer Master?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · GT Explorer Master: No
- Weight180 g vs 185 g+3%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is GT Explorer Master better than K9 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · K9 Pro: Yes
- Wired charging60 W vs 65 W+8%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,100 nits+38%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 115%+22%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.6% vs 89.3%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 158.7 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 72.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Aurora | Gray, White, Aurora, Apricot |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 805 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 717,879 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,050 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 115% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.3 | — |
