- android.gs
- Compare
- K15x vs Redmi Note 17
OPPO K15x vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17
What K15x does better (4) and where Redmi Note 17 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Display8.5
2.7Camera5.5
8.5Battery9.3
6.2Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
K15xRedmi Note 17
| K15x | Redmi Note 17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 169.7 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 79.1 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 225 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K15x better than Redmi Note 17?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi Note 17: No
- Weight212 g vs 225 g+6%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+4%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Redmi Note 17 better than K15x?
- Main camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- OLED panelNo · K15x: Yes
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 7,700 mAh+18%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Peak brightness1,125 nits vs 1,800 nits+60%
- Pixel density256 ppi vs 375 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 16 MP3.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+4%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Purple, White | Celestial Purple, Sky Teal, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,570 px | 2,396 px |
| Pixel density | 256 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,125 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 88.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 593,849 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,178 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 7,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 19.7 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 68 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
