- android.gs
- Compare
- K15s vs Galaxy A27
OPPO K15s vs Samsung Galaxy A27
What K15s does better (5) and where Galaxy A27 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display8.2
4.6Camera7.9
9.0Battery4.3
7.6Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
K15sGalaxy A27
| K15s | Galaxy A27 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.1 mm | 162.4 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 78.2 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.8 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 200 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K15s better than Galaxy A27?
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+60%
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Galaxy A27 better than K15s?
- Optical stabilisationNo · K15s: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · K15s: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- eSIMNo · K15s: Yes
- Weight205 g vs 200 g+2%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 7.8 mm+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 159.1 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 78.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Gray, Purple | Black, Blue, Light Green, Light Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1% | 86.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6360 Max | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 694,659 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,973 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 911 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.7 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.78 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 51 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
