- android.gs
- Compare
- K15 vs Pova 8 Pro
OPPO K15 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
What K15 does better (6) and where Pova 8 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
8.4Display9.6
6.9Performance7.1
8.5Camera8.0
9.4Battery8.4
8.9Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
K15Pova 8 Pro
| K15 | Pova 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.3 mm | 162.5 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.3 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 189 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K15 better than Pova 8 Pro?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+23%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Pova 8 Pro: No
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 429 ppi+7%
- Resolution (width)1,256 px vs 1,208 px+4%
Why is Pova 8 Pro better than K15?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 4,500 nits3.8×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,879 vs 3,200+11%
- Memory card slotNo · K15: Yes
- Weight205 g vs 189 g+8%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.4 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 158.3 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Gray, Silver | Arc White, Graphite Black, Tundra Green, Tonino Lamborghini Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.9% | 89.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Super | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 990,352 | 994,646 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,879 | 3,200 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
