- android.gs
- Compare
- K15 Pro vs Redmi K90 Ultra
OPPO K15 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Ultra
What K15 Pro does better (2) and where Redmi K90 Ultra wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.8
8.6Performance9.6
8.6Camera9.0
9.4Battery9.6
8.9Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
K15 ProRedmi K90 Ultra
| K15 Pro | Redmi K90 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.3 mm | 162.9 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.9 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 227 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K15 Pro better than Redmi K90 Ultra?
- Weight203 g vs 227 g+12%
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%
Why is Redmi K90 Ultra better than K15 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 9,500 nits7.9×
- AnTuTu score2,254,164 vs 3,233,695+43%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,223 vs 10,224+64%
- Battery capacity7,500 mAh vs 8,550 mAh+14%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+27%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 227 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 158.3 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Shield Glass | — |
| Colours | Gray, Silver, Pink, Black/Gold | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 9,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.9% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8500 Super | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.4 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC8 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,254,164 | 3,233,695 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,223 | 10,224 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,500 mAh | 8,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
