- android.gs
- Compare
- K15 Pro+ vs Redmi Turbo 5
OPPO K15 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5
What K15 Pro+ does better (7) and where Redmi Turbo 5 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.9
8.6Camera8.8
9.6Battery9.5
9.3Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
K15 Pro+Redmi Turbo 5
| K15 Pro+ | Redmi Turbo 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 157.5 mm | +4.9 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 75.2 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 204 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K15 Pro+ better than Redmi Turbo 5?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 7,540 mAh+6%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency3.73 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+10%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is Redmi Turbo 5 better than K15 Pro+?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 3,500 nits+94%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Weight213 g vs 204 g+4%
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 460 ppi+2%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Shield Glass | — |
| Colours | Gray, Silver, Pink | Asphalt Black, Nitro Blue, Turbo White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,268 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,756 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500s | Mediatek Dimensity 8500 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.73 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC11 | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,192,322 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,866 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,422 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 7,540 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
