- android.gs
- Compare
- K15 Pro+ vs Poco X8 Pro Max
OPPO K15 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
What K15 Pro+ does better (2) and where Poco X8 Pro Max wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.4
8.6Camera8.8
9.6Battery9.7
9.3Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
K15 Pro+Poco X8 Pro Max
| K15 Pro+ | Poco X8 Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 218 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K15 Pro+ better than Poco X8 Pro Max?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Weight213 g vs 218 g+2%
Why is Poco X8 Pro Max better than K15 Pro+?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 3,500 nits+94%
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 8,500 mAh+6%
- eSIMNo · K15 Pro+: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Gray, Silver, Pink | Black, White, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 3,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,114 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500s | Mediatek Dimensity 9500s |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.73 GHz | 3.73 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC11 | Immortalis-G925 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,445,108 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 8,539 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 6,229 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 8,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 25.4 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -20.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 80 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
