- android.gs
- Compare
- K14 vs RugKing 5 Pro
OPPO K14 vs UleFone RugKing 5 Pro
What K14 does better (12) and where RugKing 5 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Display5.4
4.6Camera6.1
8.8Battery8.8
6.7Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
K14RugKing 5 Pro
| K14 | RugKing 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 179 mm | −12.4 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 85 mm | −6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 26.5 mm | −17.9 mm |
| Weight | 216 g | 629 g | −413 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K14 better than RugKing 5 Pro?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Weight216 g vs 629 g2.9×
- 5GYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 26.5 mm3.1×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Peak brightness1,125 nits vs 910 nits+24%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
- Screen-to-body ratio85.2% vs 71.7%+19%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is RugKing 5 Pro better than K14?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 20,000 mAh2.9×
- NFCNo · K14: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Pixel density256 ppi vs 396 ppi+55%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 216 g | 629 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 26.5 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 179 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Prism Violet, Prism White, Icy Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,570 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 256 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,125 nits | 910 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 71.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 20,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 37% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.14 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 110 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
