- android.gs
- Compare
- K12 Plus vs Galaxy A55
OPPO K12 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What K12 Plus does better (8) and where Galaxy A55 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.4
8.1Camera8.3
9.1Battery5.0
7.5Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
K12 PlusGalaxy A55
| K12 Plus | Galaxy A55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 161.1 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 77.4 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 213 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K12 Plus better than Galaxy A55?
- Wired charging80 W vs 25 W3.2×
- Battery capacity6,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+28%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight192 g vs 213 g+11%
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,000 nits+10%
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 55%+36%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.3% vs 85.8%+3%
Why is Galaxy A55 better than K12 Plus?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · K12 Plus: Yes
- eSIMNo · K12 Plus: Yes
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+5%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, White | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 85.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Exynos 1480 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,598 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,259 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14.0 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
