- android.gs
- Compare
- K11 vs GT Neo 5 240W
OPPO K11 vs Realme GT Neo 5 240W
What K11 does better (6) and where GT Neo 5 240W wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display9.3
8.1Camera8.6
7.7Battery6.8
8.7Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
K11GT Neo 5 240W
| K11 | GT Neo 5 240W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K11 better than GT Neo 5 240W?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Memory card slotYes · GT Neo 5 240W: No
- Weight184 g vs 199 g+8%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is GT Neo 5 240W better than K11?
- Wired charging100 W vs 240 W2.4×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Charged in 30 min115% vs 375%3.3×
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,400 nits+27%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+18%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 451 ppi+15%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,240 px+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Moonshadow Gray; Glacier Blue | Purple, Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 451 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 87.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 240 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 115% | 375% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13.1 | realme UI 4.0 |
