android.gs
Compare
Find X9 vs 17 Ultra

OPPO Find X9 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

What Find X9 does better (8) and where 17 Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Find X9

9.6Score

8 advantages≈ $1,300

Xiaomi · 202617 Ultra

9.7Score

10 advantages≈ $1,250

Higher score

8.9Display9.1

9.6Performance9.5

9.4Camera9.8

9.6Battery9.6

9.7Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Find X917 Ultra

	Find X9	17 Ultra	Difference
Height	157 mm	162.9 mm	−5.9 mm
Width	73.9 mm	77.6 mm	−3.7 mm
Thickness	8 mm	8.3 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	203 g	218 g	−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Find X9 better than 17 Ultra?

AnTuTu score3,400,423 vs 2,777,490+22%
Battery capacity7,025 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+17%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 416 ppi+11%
Weight203 g vs 218 g+8%
Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 3,500 nits+3%
Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%
Resolution (width)1,256 px vs 1,200 px+5%
Thickness8 mm vs 8.3 mm+4%

Why is 17 Ultra better than Find X9?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,557 vs 10,896+14%
Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
Optical zoom3× vs 4.2×+40%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Max video4K vs 8K
CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+9%
Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Charged in 30 min54% vs 72%+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Find X9≈ $1,3009.6	Xiaomi 17 Ultra≈ $1,2509.7
Design
Weight	203 g	218 g
Thickness	8 mm	8.3 mm
Height	157 mm	162.9 mm
Width	73.9 mm	77.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0
Colours	Space Black, Titanium Grey, Velvet Red, White	Black, White, Starlit Green
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.9″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,256 px	1,200 px
Resolution (height)	2,760 px	2,608 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	416 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,600 nits	3,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,114 nits	1,132 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	91%	92.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 9500	Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.21 GHz	4.6 GHz
GPU	Arm G1-Ultra	Adreno 840
AnTuTu score	3,400,423	2,777,490
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	9,557	10,896
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,948
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.4"	1"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	4.2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,025 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	19.1 h
Wired charging	80 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	54%	72%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display, ultrasonic
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 16	HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised	5	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,300	—
Endurance per cycle	69 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	D	—