How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Find X9 vs GT 8 Pro

OPPO Find X9 vs Realme GT 8 Pro

What Find X9 does better (9) and where GT 8 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Find X9
OPPO · 2025Find X9
9.6Score
9 advantages≈ $1,300
vs
Realme GT 8 Pro
Realme · 2025GT 8 Pro
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $1,150
Higher score
8.9Display9.8
9.6Performance9.5
9.4Camera9.5
9.6Battery9.8
9.7Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Find X9GT 8 Pro
73.9 × 157876.9 × 161.88.2
Find X9GT 8 ProDifference
Height157 mm161.8 mm−4.8 mm
Width73.9 mm76.9 mm−3 mm
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm−0.2 mm
Weight203 g214 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Find X9 better than GT 8 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score3,400,423 vs 2,955,505+15%
  2. Major OS updates promised5 vs 4+25%
  3. Energy classA vs B
  4. Repairability classB vs C
  5. Weight203 g vs 214 g+5%
  6. Battery charge cycles1,300 vs 1,100+18%
  7. Endurance per cycle69 h vs 60 h+15%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
  9. Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%

Why is GT 8 Pro better than Find X9?

  1. Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
  2. Measured brightness1,114 nits vs 2,262 nits2×
  3. Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 7,000 nits+94%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,557 vs 10,694+12%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. Charged in 30 min54% vs 100%+85%
  8. Pixel density460 ppi vs 508 ppi+10%
  9. CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+9%
  10. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
  11. Resolution (width)1,256 px vs 1,440 px+15%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Find X9OPPO Find X9≈ $1,3009.6
Realme GT 8 ProRealme GT 8 Pro≈ $1,1509.7
Design
Weight203 g214 g
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm
Height157 mm161.8 mm
Width73.9 mm76.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursSpace Black, Titanium Grey, Velvet Red, WhiteDiary White, Urban Blue, Green, Aston Martin Green
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,256 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,760 px3,136 px
Pixel density460 ppi508 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits7,000 nits
Measured brightness1,114 nits2,262 nits
Screen-to-body ratio91%90.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9500Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.21 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUArm G1-UltraAdreno 840
AnTuTu score3,400,4232,955,505
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,55710,694
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,509
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,025 mAh7,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—20.4 h
Wired charging80 W120 W
Charged in 30 min54%100%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth66
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16Realme UI 7.0
Major OS updates promised54
EU label
Energy classAB
Battery charge cycles1,3001,100
Endurance per cycle69 h60 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classDD
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare