How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Find X9 Ultra vs Galaxy A14 LTE

OPPO Find X9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE

What Find X9 Ultra does better (20) and where Galaxy A14 LTE wins (2) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra
OPPO · 2026Find X9 Ultra
9.7Score
20 advantages≈ $2,300
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Samsung · 2023Galaxy A14 LTE
7.0Score
2 advantages≈ $170
9.8Camera7.6
9.7Battery5.6
9.7Features5.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Find X9 UltraGalaxy A14 LTE
77 × 163.28.778 × 167.79.1
Find X9 UltraGalaxy A14 LTEDifference
Height163.2 mm167.7 mm−4.5 mm
Width77 mm78 mm−1 mm
Thickness8.7 mm9.1 mm−0.4 mm
Weight235 g201 g+34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Find X9 Ultra better than Galaxy A14 LTE?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Battery capacity7,050 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+41%
  3. CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 2 GHz2.3×
  4. OLED panelYes · Galaxy A14 LTE: No
  5. Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy A14 LTE: No
  6. Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A14 LTE: No
  7. Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy A14 LTE: No
  8. 5GYes · Galaxy A14 LTE: No
  9. Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
  10. Max video4K vs 1080p
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · Galaxy A14 LTE: No
  12. eSIMYes · Galaxy A14 LTE: No

Why is Galaxy A14 LTE better than Find X9 Ultra?

  1. Memory card slotNo · Find X9 Ultra: Yes
  2. Weight235 g vs 201 g+17%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Find X9 UltraOPPO Find X9 Ultra≈ $2,3009.7
Design
Weight235 g201 g
Thickness8.7 mm9.1 mm
Height163.2 mm167.7 mm
Width77 mm78 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackSilicone polymer—
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus 2—
ColoursTundra Umber, Canyon Orange, Polar Glacier—
Display
Screen size6.8″6.6″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLCD
OLED panelYesNo
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)3,168 px2,040 px
Pixel density510 ppi—
Refresh rate144 Hz—
Peak brightness3,600 nits—
Measured brightness1,156 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90%—
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Mediatek Helio G85
Chip makerQualcommMediatek
Process3 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.6 GHz2 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Mali G52 MC2
AnTuTu score2,854,496—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,895—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme7,339—
Memory
RAM16 GB—
Storage (max)1,024 GB—
Storage (base)256 GB—
Storage typeUFS 4.1—
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.5f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.12"—
Rear cameras43
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom10×10×
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate120 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP13 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity7,050 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)20.2 h—
Wired charging100 W—
Charged in 30 min75%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesNo
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth65.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2—
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
Loudspeaker loudness-25.6 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerproximity, accelerometer, light, compass, fingerprint
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16 up to 5 major OS updatesAndroid 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16One UI
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle75 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare