- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X6 vs Aquos R8s
OPPO Find X6 vs Sharp Aquos R8s
What Find X6 does better (16) and where Aquos R8s wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X6Aquos R8s
| Find X6 | Aquos R8s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 159 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 179 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X6 better than Aquos R8s?
- Wired charging80 W vs 15 W5.3×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Aquos R8s: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Aquos R8s: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Aquos R8s: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 403 ppi+12%
- Peak brightness1,450 nits vs 1,300 nits+12%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+5%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is Aquos R8s better than Find X6?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Memory card slotNo · Find X6: Yes
- eSIMNo · Find X6: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Find X6: Yes
- Weight207 g vs 179 g+16%
- CPU frequency3.05 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+5%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.7 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 159 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Green, Gold | Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,450 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 85.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,755,232 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,351 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,376 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.8× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,750 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 125% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13.1 | — |
