- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X5 vs Blade V40 Pro
OPPO Find X5 vs ZTE Blade V40 Pro
What Find X5 does better (20) and where Blade V40 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display6.5
8.8Camera6.1
7.3Battery7.9
8.3Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X5Blade V40 Pro
| Find X5 | Blade V40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.3 mm | 163.9 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 76.2 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 190 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X5 better than Blade V40 Pro?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 65 W+23%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2 GHz+42%
Why is Blade V40 Pro better than Find X5?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+6%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Find X5: Yes
- Weight196 g vs 190 g+3%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 100%+6%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 8.3 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 160.3 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Purple | Dark Green, Iridescent White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 807 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 86% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Unisoc Tiger T618 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali G52 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 810,715 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,331 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,527 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | MyOS 11 |
