- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X5 Lite vs Redmi K40S
OPPO Find X5 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi K40S
What Find X5 Lite does better (10) and where Redmi K40S wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display7.9
7.5Camera8.0
5.2Battery5.5
7.9Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X5 LiteRedmi K40S
| Find X5 Lite | Redmi K40S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.6 mm | 163.2 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 76 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 195 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X5 Lite better than Redmi K40S?
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K40S: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40S: No
- Weight173 g vs 195 g+13%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Charged in 30 min97% vs 79%+23%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi K40S better than Find X5 Lite?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Find X5 Lite: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Find X5 Lite: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,300 nits+62%
- Wired charging65 W vs 67 W+3%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 160.6 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 631 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 86.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 407,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,276 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 97% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 12 | MIUI 13 |
