- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X3 Neo vs Narzo 20 Pro
OPPO Find X3 Neo vs Realme Narzo 20 Pro
What Find X3 Neo does better (21) and where Narzo 20 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display4.8
8.8Camera6.5
5.2Battery5.2
7.5Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X3 NeoNarzo 20 Pro
| Find X3 Neo | Narzo 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162.3 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 75.4 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 191 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X3 Neo better than Narzo 20 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 480 nits2.3×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Narzo 20 Pro: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Narzo 20 Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Narzo 20 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Narzo 20 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Narzo 20 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Narzo 20 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+39%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
Why is Narzo 20 Pro better than Find X3 Neo?
- Memory card slotNo · Find X3 Neo: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Find X3 Neo: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | White Knight, Black Ninja |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 480 nits |
| Measured brightness | 748 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 83.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 929,774 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,127 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,474 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS | — |
