- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X2 vs X3 SuperZoom
OPPO Find X2 vs Realme X3 SuperZoom
What Find X2 does better (15) and where X3 SuperZoom wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display6.8
8.6Camera9.3
4.8Battery3.1
7.5Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X2X3 SuperZoom
| Find X2 | X3 SuperZoom | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 163.8 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.8 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 202 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X2 better than X3 SuperZoom?
- Wired charging65 W vs 30 W2.2×
- OLED panelYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- 5GYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- Measured brightness850 nits vs 437 nits+95%
- Pixel density513 ppi vs 399 ppi+29%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Charged in 30 min79% vs 55%+44%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS vs -28 LUFS+-11%
Why is X3 SuperZoom better than Find X2?
- Optical zoom2× vs 5×2.5×
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.96 GHz+4%
- Weight209 g vs 202 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Ocean | Glacier Blue, Arctic White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,168 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 850 nits | 437 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 84.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.96 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 640 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 477,905 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,579 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25 LUFS | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.1 | — |
