- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X2 Neo vs Galaxy A31
OPPO Find X2 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A31
What Find X2 Neo does better (21) and where Galaxy A31 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display5.7
3.6Performance3.6
8.1Camera6.2
3.1Battery4.0
8.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X2 NeoGalaxy A31
| Find X2 Neo | Galaxy A31 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.4 mm | 159.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 73.1 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 185 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X2 Neo better than Galaxy A31?
- AnTuTu score308,231 vs 151,8152×
- Wired charging30 W vs 15 W2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy A31: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A31: No
- 5GYes · Galaxy A31: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A31: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 25%3×
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
Why is Galaxy A31 better than Find X2 Neo?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,815 vs 5,0962.8×
- Battery capacity4,025 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+24%
- Memory card slotNo · Find X2 Neo: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · Find X2 Neo: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Find X2 Neo: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
- Pixel density402 ppi vs 411 ppi+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 159.4 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 73.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Moonlight Black, Starry Blue | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Red, Prism Crush White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 635 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 308,231 | 151,815 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,815 | 5,096 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,025 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | -30.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.49 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7 | One UI 4.1 |
