- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X10 E vs X200T
OPPO Find X10 E vs Vivo X200T
What Find X10 E does better (6) and where X200T wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display9.3
9.3Performance9.0
9.3Camera9.3
9.6Battery9.5
9.3Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X10 EX200T
| Find X10 E | X200T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157 mm | 160 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 203 g | 203 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X10 E better than X200T?
- AnTuTu score3,298,445 vs 2,725,989+21%
- Battery capacity7,025 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+13%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- CPU frequency3.73 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+3%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
- Bluetooth6.2 vs 5.4+15%
Why is X200T better than Find X10 E?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 5,000 nits2.8×
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,498 vs 8,430+12%
- eSIMNo · Find X10 E: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 157 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Core |
| Colours | Titanium Gray, Blue | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500s | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.73 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC11 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,298,445 | 2,725,989 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,498 | 8,430 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,025 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 17 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 5 |
