- android.gs
- Compare
- Find N3 vs Mix Fold 2
OPPO Find N3 vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
What Find N3 does better (15) and where Mix Fold 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display4.3
6.8Performance5.4
6.9Camera7.0
6.3Battery6.3
6.8Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find N3Mix Fold 2
| Find N3 | Mix Fold 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 153.4 mm | 161.1 mm | −7.7 mm |
| Width | 143.1 mm | 144.7 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 5.8 mm | 5.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 239 g | 262 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find N3 better than Mix Fold 2?
- AnTuTu score1,417,837 vs 1,050,139+35%
- Peak brightness2,800 nits vs 1,300 nits2.2×
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,805 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,166 vs 4,368+18%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Mix Fold 2: No
- Pixel density426 ppi vs 360 ppi+18%
- Measured brightness1,240 nits vs 1,054 nits+18%
- Weight239 g vs 262 g+10%
- Charged in 30 min105% vs 75%+40%
- Resolution (width)2,268 px vs 1,914 px+18%
Why is Mix Fold 2 better than Find N3?
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Screen size7.8″ vs 8″+3%
- Thickness5.8 mm vs 5.4 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 239 g | 262 g |
| Thickness | 5.8 mm | 5.4 mm |
| Height | 153.4 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 143.1 mm | 144.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Glass protection | — | Schott UTG glass |
| Colours | Black, Green, Gold, Red | Black, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.8″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO3 OLED | Foldable LTPO2 OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,268 px | 1,914 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,440 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 426 ppi | 360 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,800 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,240 nits | 1,054 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 88.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,417,837 | 1,050,139 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,166 | 4,368 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.43" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,805 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 105% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.3 LUFS | -26.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | MIUI Fold 13 |
