- android.gs
- Compare
- F35 vs Camon 50 4G
OPPO F35 vs Tecno Camon 50 4G
What F35 does better (6) and where Camon 50 4G wins (16) — every spec side by side.
8.2Display9.7
6.2Camera8.2
9.4Battery8.5
6.0Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
F35Camon 50 4G
| F35 | Camon 50 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.1 mm | 162.4 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.2 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 172 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F35 better than Camon 50 4G?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+30%
- 5GYes · Camon 50 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 50 4G better than F35?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · F35: Yes
- NFCNo · F35: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · F35: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · F35: Yes
- Weight205 g vs 172 g+19%
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 429 ppi+8%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 159.1 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Guard | Unspecified |
| Colours | Mist Pink, Titanium Grey, Wave Blue | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1% | 89.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6360 Max | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 595,376 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,020 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 40% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.16 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
