- android.gs
- Compare
- F31 Pro+ vs Pova 7 Ultra
OPPO F31 Pro+ vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What F31 Pro+ does better (7) and where Pova 7 Ultra wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.6
7.8Camera7.8
9.2Battery9.1
7.4Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
F31 Pro+Pova 7 Ultra
| F31 Pro+ | Pova 7 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 160 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.2 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 201 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F31 Pro+ better than Pova 7 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+17%
- Wired charging80 W vs 70 W+14%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+16%
Why is Pova 7 Ultra better than F31 Pro+?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 4,500 nits2.8×
- Wireless chargingNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
- NFCNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+27%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
- Charged in 30 min63% vs 83%+32%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Festival Pink, Himalayan White, Gemstone Blue | Geek White, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,771,444 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,914 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 63% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.16 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
