- android.gs
- Compare
- F29 vs Camon 40 Pro 4G
OPPO F29 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
What F29 does better (5) and where Camon 40 Pro 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display8.6
6.1Camera9.1
8.5Battery7.9
6.7Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
F29Camon 40 Pro 4G
| F29 | Camon 40 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.4 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.3 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 178 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F29 better than Camon 40 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+25%
- 5GYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 40 Pro 4G better than F29?
- Optical stabilisationNo · F29: Yes
- NFCNo · F29: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · F29: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · F29: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Weight185 g vs 178 g+4%
- Charged in 30 min43% vs 65%+51%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.3 mm+5%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Deep Purple, Glacier Blue | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 90% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 600,062 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.12 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
