- android.gs
- Compare
- F29 Pro vs Redmi Turbo 4
OPPO F29 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
What F29 Pro does better (2) and where Redmi Turbo 4 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display8.9
7.5Camera8.8
8.9Battery9.3
7.4Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
F29 ProRedmi Turbo 4
| F29 Pro | Redmi Turbo 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 161 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 204 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F29 Pro better than Redmi Turbo 4?
- Weight180 g vs 204 g+13%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.1 mm+7%
Why is Redmi Turbo 4 better than F29 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,200 nits2.7×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- NFCNo · F29 Pro: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,550 mAh+9%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+30%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · F29 Pro: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Marble White, Granite Black | Black, White, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 88.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,960,745 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,515 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HyperOS 2 |
