android.gs
Compare
F29 Pro vs Poco X7

OPPO F29 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7

What F29 Pro does better (6) and where Poco X7 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025F29 Pro

8.7Score

6 advantages≈ $320

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco X7

8.4Score

10 advantages≈ $320

8.0Display8.8

7.5Camera8.2

8.9Battery5.4

7.4Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

F29 ProPoco X7

	F29 Pro	Poco X7	Difference
Height	161.5 mm	162.3 mm	−0.8 mm
Width	74.9 mm	74.4 mm	+0.5 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	8.4 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	180 g	186 g	−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is F29 Pro better than Poco X7?

Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
Stereo speakersYes · Poco X7: No
Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,110 mAh+17%
Weight180 g vs 186 g+3%
Charged in 30 min68% vs 58%+17%
Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.4 mm+11%

Why is Poco X7 better than F29 Pro?

Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,000 nits2.5×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
NFCNo · F29 Pro: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · F29 Pro: Yes
eSIMNo · F29 Pro: Yes
Pixel density394 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO F29 Pro≈ $3208.7	Xiaomi Poco X7≈ $3208.4
Design
Weight	180 g	186 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	8.4 mm
Height	161.5 mm	162.3 mm
Width	74.9 mm	74.4 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Marble White, Granite Black	Black, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,412 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,200 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,111 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.3%	88.9%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy	Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	677,093
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,846
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	846
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.5
Main sensor size	1/2.88"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	5,110 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.1 h
Wired charging	80 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	68%	58%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
SAR (head)	1 W/kg	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	HyperOS
EU label
Energy class	—	C
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	41 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	B