- android.gs
- Compare
- F27 vs Galaxy A55
OPPO F27 vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What F27 does better (4) and where Galaxy A55 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display7.4
5.9Camera8.3
6.8Battery5.0
6.8Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
F27Galaxy A55
| F27 | Galaxy A55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 161.1 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.4 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 213 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F27 better than Galaxy A55?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 1,000 nits2.1×
- Weight187 g vs 213 g+14%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+6%
Why is Galaxy A55 better than F27?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · F27: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · F27: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · F27: Yes
- eSIMNo · F27: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+15%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Emerald Green, Amber Orange | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 85.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Exynos 1480 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,598 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,259 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
