- android.gs
- Compare
- F27 Pro+ vs Poco F6
OPPO F27 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Poco F6
What F27 Pro+ does better (3) and where Poco F6 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
F27 Pro+Poco F6
| F27 Pro+ | Poco F6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.5 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F27 Pro+ better than Poco F6?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F6: No
Why is Poco F6 better than F27 Pro+?
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 2,400 nits2.5×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- NFCNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Wired charging67 W vs 90 W+34%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Blue | Black, Green, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 2,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,218 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,497,886 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,883 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,110 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.6 h |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 84% | 86% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.97 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
