- android.gs
- Compare
- F27 Pro+ vs V40 SE
OPPO F27 Pro+ vs Vivo V40 SE
What F27 Pro+ does better (12) and where V40 SE wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
F27 Pro+V40 SE
| F27 Pro+ | V40 SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 75.8 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 186 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F27 Pro+ better than V40 SE?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Wired charging67 W vs 44 W+52%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · V40 SE: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Weight177 g vs 186 g+5%
- Charged in 30 min84% vs 60%+40%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 86.8%+3%
Why is V40 SE better than F27 Pro+?
- NFCNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,800 nits+89%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Blue | Crystal Black, Leather Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,196 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 86.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 569,252 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,091 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 84% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.97 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
