- android.gs
- Compare
- F25 Pro vs Redmi Turbo 3
OPPO F25 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
What F25 Pro does better (6) and where Redmi Turbo 3 wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display8.8
7.5Camera8.8
7.2Battery7.6
5.7Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
F25 ProRedmi Turbo 3
| F25 Pro | Redmi Turbo 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 160.5 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F25 Pro better than Redmi Turbo 3?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi Turbo 3: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi Turbo 3: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
Why is Redmi Turbo 3 better than F25 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 2,400 nits2.2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · F25 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · F25 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · F25 Pro: Yes
- Wired charging67 W vs 90 W+34%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz+15%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
- Charged in 30 min62% vs 100%+61%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Ocean Blue, Lava Red | Black, Green, Titanium, Harry Potter |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 2,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,823,082 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,989 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,019 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.98 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HyperOS |
