- android.gs
- Compare
- F25 Pro vs Y200 Pro
OPPO F25 Pro vs Vivo Y200 Pro
What F25 Pro does better (12) and where Y200 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
F25 ProY200 Pro
| F25 Pro | Y200 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 164.4 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.9 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 177 g | 172 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F25 Pro better than Y200 Pro?
- Wired charging67 W vs 44 W+52%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Memory card slotYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Y200 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Y200 Pro better than F25 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · F25 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,300 nits+18%
- Weight177 g vs 172 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda glass | — |
| Colours | Ocean Blue, Lava Red | Silk black, Silk green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 561,575 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,201 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.98 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | Funtouch 14 |
