- android.gs
- Compare
- F15 vs Galaxy A31
OPPO F15 vs Samsung Galaxy A31
What F15 does better (8) and where Galaxy A31 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display5.7
6.0Camera6.2
3.0Battery4.0
3.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
F15Galaxy A31
| F15 | Galaxy A31 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 159.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 73.1 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 185 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F15 better than Galaxy A31?
- Wired charging20 W vs 15 W+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 25%2×
- Weight172 g vs 185 g+8%
- CPU frequency2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz+5%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+9%
Why is Galaxy A31 better than F15?
- Battery capacity4,025 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+24%
- NFCNo · F15: Yes
- Peak brightness430 nits vs 600 nits+40%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 73.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Lightening Black, Unicorn White | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Red, Prism Crush White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 408 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 430 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 635 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 151,815 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,096 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,025 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.2 W/kg | 0.49 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | One UI 4.1 |
