- android.gs
- Compare
- A94 vs Galaxy A32 5G
OPPO A94 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
What A94 does better (12) and where Galaxy A32 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display2.4
6.8Camera6.3
3.2Battery4.0
3.5Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
A94Galaxy A32 5G
| A94 | Galaxy A32 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 164.2 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 76.1 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9.1 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 205 g | −33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A94 better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Wired charging30 W vs 15 W2×
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy A32 5G: No
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 400 nits2×
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 270 ppi+51%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight172 g vs 205 g+19%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 9.1 mm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.2% vs 81.6%+4%
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than A94?
- 5GNo · A94: Yes
- NFCNo · A94: Yes
- Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 497 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 | Mediatek Dimensity 720 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 226,561 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,673 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 362 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.33 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | One UI 5 |
