- android.gs
- Compare
- A92s vs Galaxy S10
OPPO A92s vs Samsung Galaxy S10
What A92s does better (10) and where Galaxy S10 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display6.9
6.5Camera5.1
2.8Battery2.8
7.1Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
A92sGalaxy S10
| A92s | Galaxy S10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 149.9 mm | +13.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 70.4 mm | +5.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 157 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A92s better than Galaxy S10?
- Main camera48 MP vs 16 MP3×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- 5GYes · Galaxy S10: No
- NFCYes · Galaxy S10: No
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 3,400 mAh+18%
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Galaxy S10: No
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.1″+8%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 10 MP+60%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
Why is Galaxy S10 better than A92s?
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 1,215 nits2.5×
- OLED panelNo · A92s: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · A92s: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · A92s: Yes
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 550 ppi+37%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+35%
- Memory card slotNo · A92s: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · A92s: Yes
- Weight184 g vs 157 g+17%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 157 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 149.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 70.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Black, White, Pink | White, Black, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,040 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 550 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 1,215 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 817 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 88% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Mali G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 747,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,961 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 949 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 9 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.1 | One UI |
