- android.gs
- Compare
- A92s vs Galaxy Note 9
OPPO A92s vs Samsung Galaxy Note 9
What A92s does better (10) and where Galaxy Note 9 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display6.3
6.5Camera5.3
2.8Battery3.0
7.1Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
A92sGalaxy Note 9
| A92s | Galaxy Note 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 161.9 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 201 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A92s better than Galaxy Note 9?
- Main camera48 MP vs 12 MP4×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- 5GYes · Galaxy Note 9: No
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Galaxy Note 9: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight184 g vs 201 g+9%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.4″+3%
- Process7 nm vs 10 nm+43%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.8 mm+9%
Why is Galaxy Note 9 better than A92s?
- OLED panelNo · A92s: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · A92s: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · A92s: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · A92s: Yes
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 710 nits+48%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+35%
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 516 ppi+29%
- Memory card slotNo · A92s: Yes
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.5+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 161.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Pink | Black, Blue, Brown |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,960 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 516 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 710 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 653 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 83.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 | Samsung Exynos 9810 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Process | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Mali G72 MP18 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 606,593 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,853 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.38 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.1 | One UI 2.5 |
