- android.gs
- Compare
- A73 vs Redmi Note 9 Pro
OPPO A73 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
What A73 does better (6) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Display4.2
5.8Camera7.2
3.1Battery6.8
5.0Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
A73Redmi Note 9 Pro
| A73 | Redmi Note 9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.8 mm | 165.8 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 76.7 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.8 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 163 g | 209 g | −46 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A73 better than Redmi Note 9 Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro: No
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Weight163 g vs 209 g+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.8 mm+17%
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro better than A73?
- Main camera16 MP vs 64 MP4×
- Battery capacity4,015 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+25%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Process11 nm vs 8 nm+38%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.9+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 163 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 159.8 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Tropical Green, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 614 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 84.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 11 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 279,625 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 315 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.06" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,015 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.66 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.2 | MIUI 11 |
