- android.gs
- Compare
- A7 Pro Max vs X300 E
OPPO A7 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 E
What A7 Pro Max does better (4) and where X300 E wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.5
5.7Performance9.1
7.8Camera9.4
9.5Battery9.2
8.4Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
A7 Pro MaxX300 E
| A7 Pro Max | X300 E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 157.5 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 74.3 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 224 g | 200 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A7 Pro Max better than X300 E?
- Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+39%
- eSIMYes · X300 E: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is X300 E better than A7 Pro Max?
- AnTuTu score652,054 vs 2,886,5274.4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,250 vs 9,0564×
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 5,000 nits2.8×
- Telephoto cameraNo · A7 Pro Max: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · A7 Pro Max: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+58%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · A7 Pro Max: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 224 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Lunar Black, Surfing Blue, Orange | White, Gray, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4% | 90.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 | Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 829 |
| AnTuTu score | 652,054 | 2,886,527 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,250 | 9,056 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 7,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | — | 40 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
