- android.gs
- Compare
- A6s Pro (China) vs Camon 50 Pro 4G
OPPO A6s Pro (China) vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
What A6s Pro (China) does better (7) and where Camon 50 Pro 4G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display9.7
5.5Camera9.0
9.2Battery8.6
7.6Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
A6s Pro (China)Camon 50 Pro 4G
| A6s Pro (China) | Camon 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.4 mm | 162.4 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 77 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 171 g | +23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A6s Pro (China) better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Camon 50 Pro 4G: No
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+14%
- Wired charging80 W vs 60 W+33%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than A6s Pro (China)?
- Optical stabilisationNo · A6s Pro (China): Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · A6s Pro (China): Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · A6s Pro (China): Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · A6s Pro (China): Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Weight194 g vs 171 g+13%
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 429 ppi+8%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.4 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 171 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 158.4 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Unspecified |
| Colours | Blue, White, White/Blue | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 89.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6360 Max | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 569,394 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
