How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. A6s 4G vs X300 FE

OPPO A6s 4G vs Vivo X300 FE

What A6s 4G does better (3) and where X300 FE wins (25) — every spec side by side.

OPPO A6s 4G
OPPO · 2026A6s 4G
8.1Score
3 advantages
vs
Vivo X300 FE
Vivo · 2026X300 FE
9.6Score
25 advantages≈ $920
Higher score
6.4Display8.3
5.5Camera9.6
9.2Battery9.6
8.3Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

A6s 4GX300 FE
78.5 × 166.68.671.8 × 150.88.2
A6s 4GX300 FEDifference
Height166.6 mm150.8 mm+15.8 mm
Width78.5 mm71.8 mm+6.7 mm
Thickness8.6 mm8.2 mm+0.4 mm
Weight215 g190 g+25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is A6s 4G better than X300 FE?

  1. Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
  2. Memory card slotYes · X300 FE: No
  3. Screen size6.8″ vs 6.3″+7%

Why is X300 FE better than A6s 4G?

  1. Peak brightness1,125 nits vs 5,000 nits4.4×
  2. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  3. OLED panelNo · A6s 4G: Yes
  4. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Optical stabilisationNo · A6s 4G: Yes
  6. Telephoto cameraNo · A6s 4G: Yes
  7. Wireless chargingNo · A6s 4G: Yes
  8. Pixel density256 ppi vs 461 ppi+80%
  9. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  10. Rear cameras1 vs 33×
  11. Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
  12. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+36%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X300 FEVivo X300 FE≈ $9209.6
Design
Weight215 g190 g
Thickness8.6 mm8.2 mm
Height166.6 mm150.8 mm
Width78.5 mm71.8 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursCappuccino Brown, Ice WhiteMisty Purple (Lilac Purple), Radiant White, Cool Black (Noir Black), Green, Urban Olive
Display
Screen size6.8″6.3″
PanelIPS LCDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)720 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)1,570 px2,640 px
Pixel density256 ppi461 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,125 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,774 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.2%90.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process6 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 829
AnTuTu score—2,234,101
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—9,356
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,189
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size—1/1.56"
Rear cameras13
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video1080p8K
4K video frame rate—120 fps
Selfie camera16 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,000 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—18.8 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min56%55%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5G—Yes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth55.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised—5
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—59 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare