- android.gs
- Compare
- A6s 4G vs X200T
OPPO A6s 4G vs Vivo X200T
What A6s 4G does better (2) and where X200T wins (26) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
A6s 4GX200T
| A6s 4G | X200T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 160 mm | +6.6 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 203 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A6s 4G better than X200T?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+13%
- Memory card slotYes · X200T: No
Why is X200T better than A6s 4G?
- Peak brightness1,125 nits vs 5,000 nits4.4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · A6s 4G: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · A6s 4G: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · A6s 4G: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · A6s 4G: Yes
- Pixel density256 ppi vs 460 ppi+80%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+30%
- Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 215 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Core |
| Colours | Cappuccino Brown, Ice White | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,570 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 256 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,125 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 90.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,725,989 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 8,430 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 40 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 5 |
