- android.gs
- Compare
- A58 4G vs Galaxy A24 4G
OPPO A58 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What A58 4G does better (7) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display7.0
4.6Camera7.8
6.0Battery5.3
6.2Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
A58 4GGalaxy A24 4G
| A58 4G | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.1 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 195 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A58 4G better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Charged in 30 min56% vs 46%+22%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.6% vs 82.4%+5%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.3 mm+4%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than A58 4G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · A58 4G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · A58 4G: Yes
- Peak brightness680 nits vs 1,000 nits+47%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · A58 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Glowing Black, Dazzling Green | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 680 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.6% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
