- android.gs
- Compare
- A53 vs Galaxy S20 FE
OPPO A53 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
What A53 does better (4) and where Galaxy S20 FE wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display6.6
4.2Camera9.0
4.6Battery4.3
4.2Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
A53Galaxy S20 FE
| A53 | Galaxy S20 FE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 159.8 mm | +4.1 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 74.5 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 186 g | 190 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A53 better than Galaxy S20 FE?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Main camera13 MP vs 12 MP+8%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy S20 FE: No
- Weight186 g vs 190 g+2%
Why is Galaxy S20 FE better than A53?
- OLED panelNo · A53: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · A53: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · A53: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · A53: Yes
- NFCNo · A53: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+58%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 407 ppi+51%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · A53: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 159.8 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Fairy White, Electric Black, Fancy Blue | Cloud Lavender, Cloud Mint, Cloud Navy, Cloud White, Cloud Red, Cloud Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 84.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 | Exynos 990 - Version 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 11 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G77 MP11 - Version 1 Adreno 650 - Version 2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 909,679 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,385 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,061 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.06" | 1/1.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 33% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.77 W/kg | 0.24 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.2 | One UI 5.1 |
