- android.gs
- Compare
- A2 Pro vs 13T
OPPO A2 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T
What A2 Pro does better (7) and where 13T wins (14) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
A2 Pro13T
| A2 Pro | 13T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.2 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 75.7 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 193 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A2 Pro better than 13T?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Weight183 g vs 193 g+5%
- Charged in 30 min81% vs 71%+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 87.5%+2%
Why is 13T better than A2 Pro?
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 2,600 nits2.7×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · A2 Pro: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · A2 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · A2 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · A2 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · A2 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+19%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Purple, Brown | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,264 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 825,858 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,755 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.4 h |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 81% | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13.1 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
