- android.gs
- Compare
- A1 Pro vs Galaxy M53
OPPO A1 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M53
What A1 Pro does better (8) and where Galaxy M53 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display6.8
6.2Camera7.6
6.2Battery5.3
8.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
A1 ProGalaxy M53
| A1 Pro | Galaxy M53 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.7 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 77 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 176 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A1 Pro better than Galaxy M53?
- Wired charging67 W vs 25 W2.7×
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 400 nits2.4×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M53: No
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 44%+82%
- Weight171 g vs 176 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 85.3%+5%
Why is Galaxy M53 better than A1 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · A1 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · A1 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.4 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Gold | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 802 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 680,628 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,449 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 609 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | One UI 5.1 |
