- android.gs
- Compare
- Nord CE4 vs iQOO Z9 Turbo+
OnePlus Nord CE4 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
What Nord CE4 does better (3) and where iQOO Z9 Turbo+ wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display9.7
6.3Performance9.0
8.1Camera8.6
8.8Battery9.1
5.8Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nord CE4iQOO Z9 Turbo+
| Nord CE4 | iQOO Z9 Turbo+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 163.7 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 196 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nord CE4 better than iQOO Z9 Turbo+?
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Weight186 g vs 196 g+5%
- Charged in 30 min103% vs 65%+58%
Why is iQOO Z9 Turbo+ better than Nord CE4?
- AnTuTu score839,564 vs 2,401,3192.9×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,029 vs 7,5262.5×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 4,500 nits4.1×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,494 vs 4,5463×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- NFCNo · Nord CE4: Yes
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,400 mAh+16%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+29%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Celadon Marble, Dark Chrome | Black, White, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Fluid AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | 839,564 | 2,401,319 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,029 | 7,526 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,494 | 4,546 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 6,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 103% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.16 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 16 | OriginOS 4 |
