- android.gs
- Compare
- Nord CE3 vs iQOO Neo9
OnePlus Nord CE3 vs Vivo iQOO Neo9
What Nord CE3 does better (3) and where iQOO Neo9 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nord CE3iQOO Neo9
| Nord CE3 | iQOO Neo9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.5 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 190 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nord CE3 better than iQOO Neo9?
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo9: No
- Weight184 g vs 190 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is iQOO Neo9 better than Nord CE3?
- AnTuTu score806,420 vs 1,819,6852.3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,716 vs 5,6922.1×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,400 nits+47%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Colours | Aqua Surge, Gray Shimmer | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Fluid AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 806,420 | 1,819,685 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,716 | 5,692 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,641 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 122% | 133% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, temperature | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.17 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 13.1 | OriginOS 4 |
